There are some shifts of power in Kenya's standards body shortly after strong accusation were flying
Read more »
ODF: Open Standard; OOXML: The New and Unimproved .DOC/.XLS/Other
http://boycottnovell.com –
OOXML might never catch on like its similar predecessor; Italy does ODF
Read more »- Login to post comments
DeviceVM's proprietary/Linux split explained
http://community.zdnet.co.uk –
Covering Asus' adoption of DeviceVM's Splashtop software in all its motherboards and some laptops, we were wondering exactly which parts were proprietary and which were Linux - hence pulling back from calling it a "Linux OS".
Read more »- Login to post comments
What might come of the OOXML revolt?
http://blogs.zdnet.com –
It’s late, and in terms of the process it’s hopeless, but the appeals of the ISO vote making Office Open XML (OOXML) an official standard could still have an impact.
Read more »
- Login to post comments
Official Danish complaint to ISO
http://lodahl.blogspot.com –
The organazation OSL (www.osl.dk) (Danish organazation of OpenSource vendors) has officially posted a complaint to ISO (and Danish Standards). The complaint is regarding the process in the Danish National Body.
Read more »- Login to post comments
IIT Bombay, Microsoft at loggerheads over standards
http://www.business-standard.com –
Embers from the fiery debate over the International Organisation for Standardisation's (ISO) acceptance of Microsoft's Office Open XML (OOXML) file format as an international standard refuse to die out in India.
Read more »- Login to post comments
How Microsoft lost the office file format battle
http://www.linuxworld.com.au –
When MS announced that SP2 for Office 2007 would support ODF and not OOXML, it suffered defeat at its own hands
Read more »- Login to post comments
Another Backlash Against Microsoft in Denmark; Anger Over Microsoft Office Lock-in
- Login to post comments
Make that Three: India Appeals Adoption of OOXML
http://www.consortiuminfo.org –
Last night was the deadline for filing appeals to the adoption of OOXML by ISO/IEC JTC 1. This morning, a spokesman for the IEC acknowledged the receipt of a total of three appeals by the deadline, with the third and final appeal being filed by India, as reported by Peter Sayers, of the IDG News Service.
Read more »- Login to post comments
Will We Ever Have a GPL Test Case?
http://ostatic.com –
The GNU General Public License is nearly 20 years old (version 1 came out in 1989). In that time there have been at least 100 million lawsuits filed in the US (and that's a conservative estimate). Amazingly enough, not one of those millions of court cases has actually tested the GPL's validity. How can that be - and is it a problem for the open source software movement?
Read more »- Login to post comments
Novell Responds to Legal Assault by Betrayed Partner
http://boycottnovell.com –
Novell to aggressively fight against former partner's claims, unlike Microsoft
Read more »- Login to post comments
If It Looks Like a Duck . . . Seattle Judge Finds Software Was Sold, Not Licensed
http://www.eff.org –
In a major victory for consumers' rights, a federal district judge has firmly rejected software vendor AutoDesk's claim that its license agreement restricts its customers from re-selling the software they lawfully owned.
Read more »- Login to post comments
Viacom's 1st Amended Complaint and YouTube/Google's Answer
http://www.groklaw.net –
I thought you might like to see the actual filings in the Viacom v. YouTube/Google litigation. In April, Viacom filed a First Amended Complaint [PDF] and YouTube/Google has now filed its Answer [PDF]. If you'd like to see the original complaint and answer from 2007, for comparison purposes, we have it as text here on Groklaw.
Read more »- Login to post comments
Open source licensing suits settle in short order
http://www.lawyersweekly.ca –
Many open source licences are only two or three paragraphs long and read more like a manifesto than a traditional software licence.
Read more »SCO's Updates its "Legal Update" Page
http://www.groklaw.net –
SCO has posted some new materials on its Legal Update page, under a bizarre header, "Update on Rights to Continue Our UNIX Business." Has that ever been in dispute? If so, I've missed it. And isn't that exactly what SCO keeps trying to sell, its Unix business? I'm confused, unless one defines SCO's "business" as the business of litigation.
Read more »- Login to post comments
