Rigo Camens of BinaryFreedom makes an excellent analogy of sacrificing ideals for reaching goals faster "Purely speaking, if we sacrifice our ideals then we will accomplish our goals faster. For instance, it would take much less effort for somebody who wants an anarchist or socialist revolution to go in and kill every important member of government. The problem is that they are sacrificing their
values. If somebody really wants equality, respect, etc. then they can't go around doing violent acts. What happens after the government collapses? The masses haven't learned from the past and the new government will be just as bad as the previous one. If a revolution is caused by mass participation, the end result lasts longer and is better. This is the same with free software. If you say that closed source software is exploitive, if you say that it is wrong, then don't use it. Period. I say capitalism is wrong yet I buy some things. It's an issue of survival, but that same argument can't really be applied to your choice of software."
http://www.binaryfreedom.info –
Created by pravi 16 years 36 weeks ago – Made popular 16 years 36 weeks ago
Category: Philosophy Tags:
Category: Philosophy Tags:
- Login to post comments
kiba
16 years 36 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago
Hmm.. How do you read this
Hmm.. How do you read this article? It require me to authenticate or something. Does anybody know how to access this article?
Despite not reading the full article, I already have problem with the summary.
Especially "capitalism is wrong" phrase. I don't think capitalism is immorally wrong. In my opinion, capitalism is a great idea. If designed right, it will reap great rewards for the citizen and keep evildoers in check..
It is people who either abuse the system or destroy the system's benefit that are in the wrong. For example, M$ monopoly lead to stagnant progress in softwares and lock in consumers. RIAA and MPAA who are not only idiots but hold back the full benefit of the free market.
Becoming free of proprietary softwares is a transitive process. It is not a simple matter of switching to free operating systems and you're done. You still have to develop missing softwares to make up for what you lost in the process such as a free flash player.
geosync.orbit
16 years 36 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago
I can't read it either
Well I can't vote it up based on the blurb hopefully one of the people who run the site will see these comments.
Starchild
16 years 36 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago
Capitalism IS morally reprehensible
Actually Capitalism *is* morally wrong. For pretty much all the same reasons Free Software advocates rightly consider proprietary software morally wrong but on a much grander scale and far more serious. There is extensive literature on the subject.
pravi
16 years 36 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago
alternate link to another archive
http://mm.gnu.org.in/pipermail/fsf-friends/2008-January/005305.html
Sorry about that, the archives are for members only in the article link. I didn't want to miss the message, that is why I copied the entire message here.
Not a best practice, but it was better than missing it. I have asked binaryfreedom folks if they are willing to make the archives public.
Freedom is worth a sacrifice - RMS
pravi
16 years 36 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago
Here is the link to public archive
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.politics.activism.binaryfreedom/3069
Freedom is worth a sacrifice - RMS