Unbelievable statements in GPL related case in the Supreme Court of Mauritius

0

http://laforge.gnumonks.org –

[…] So let me phrase this more clearly: Somebody, under oath is stating at the Supreme Court, that GPL-Licensed software (which the Linux kernel definitely is), has no copyright restrictions? And that any derived work is the sole property of whoever created the derivative? What kind of pot are they smoking in Mauritius?

Full story »
akf's picture
Created by akf 13 years 14 weeks ago – Made popular 13 years 14 weeks ago
Category: Legal   Tags:

Similar stories

Ctrl-Z: a return to the Supreme Court's software patent ban? 15 years 36 weeks ago
Bilski II: Red Hat Appeals to Supreme Court over Software Non-Patentability 15 years 2 days ago
IBM tells Supreme Court software patents help free software 15 years 5 weeks ago
Red Hat addresses Supreme Court on software patents 15 years 5 days ago
TDTwister's picture

TDTwister

13 years 14 weeks 6 days 58 min ago

0

Confusion

I bet someone confuse GPL for public domain .....
And I bet that the Supreme Court of Mauritius should have a way of verifying the if the statement is true.

Best karma users

  1. andolasoft's picture
    andolasoft
  2. fred's picture
    fred
  3. nilarimogard's picture
    nilarimogard