Warning: only click through if you want to red the lastest FUD by (dis)InformationWeek's Alexander Wolfe.

Alexander Wolfe is at it again... this is the guy who wrote that Linux has too many distros and that Linux isn't technically superior to Windows! Anyway, this is his response to all those outraged comments he received. And he isn't giving an inch...

More bs/fud from Alexander Wolfe. Posted so that the fsdaily community can go post comments at this fool. As always on DISinformationweekly, the comments are the most informative part.

There’s blogging nowadays and everyone has to be writing stuff on the web all the time about what they have been doing. Sometimes even to the cost of not actually doing it properly. There is a whole bunch of newbies out there writing poor howtos, pretending to save the day of a fellow GNU/Linux user, but not teaching him any real knowledge.

Last week, my fellow Guardian columnist Helienne Lindvall published a piece headlined The cost of free, in which she called it "ironic" that "advocates of free online content" (including me) "charge hefty fees to speak at events". […]
You see, the real mistake Lindvall made was in saying that I tell artists to give their work away for free. I do no such thing.

After reading colleague Alexander Wolfe's piece about a Linux distro called "Vixta" that apes the look and feel of Windows Vista, I confess to having mixed feelings about the whole thing. Mostly negative ones.

The open-source operating system is destined to stay stuck in the shadow of Windows, blogger Alex Wolfe opines... AGAIN!

Blogger: Beyond the Basics is a new book from Packt, which will take users beyond the basics of Blogger. Written by Lee Jordan, this book will help users to take full advantage of the rich and powerful features of Blogger to transform their blog into a fresh and state-of-the-art blog as quickly and painlessly as possible.

InformationWeek have responded to critcisms of misrepresentation with ...a straw man. This short piece points out how InformationWeek's continued rehashing of old material disproves their own claim of a "growing schism".